Lies My Govt. Told Me About the CA Drought
While California’s drought conditions are actually historically normal, California’s current drought is being billed by government and media as the driest period in the state’s recorded rainfall history. Scientists who study the Western United States’ long-term climate patterns say California has been dry for significantly longer periods — more than 200 years.
However, it only takes reading the weekly California drought water-wise tips in statewide newspapers and local government websites to know the information the environmentalists are foisting on us is hogwash. While California is in the middle of an historic drought, radical environmentalists are not letting a good crisis go to waste.
“If your kitchen faucet was installed before 1994, its flow rate is likely between 2.75 and 7 gallons per minute,” the Sacramento Bee claims. “New water-efficient kitchen faucets deliver water at 2.2 gallons per minute, but that can add up quickly too; five minutes of running equals 11 gallons with an efficient faucet.”
Interesting. I ran my 2-year old kitchen faucet full blast for one minute and got just slightly over a gallon of water. And, my husband and I rarely run the kitchen faucet full blast, even while washing dishes.
Oh, the lies just keep piling on.
“With an inefficient faucet, that same five minutes of running time could mean 35 gallons down the drain.”
It would take me about 30 minutes of running my 2-year old faucet to get 35 gallons of water down the drain.
Pile these lies on to what is happening in the north state.
Drought, California Style
So if California’s drought conditions are actually historically normal, and California’s current drought is being billed as the driest period in the state’s recorded rainfall history, why is the government is breaking up hydroelectric dams, and letting much-needed water rush to the sea for Coho salmon instead?
The human cost of over-regulation is bleeding California businesses and middle-class families.
In California, there is a perceived water war between the North and South parts of the state. The State of Jefferson is making headway with its secession over this and serious representation issues.
But it’s a government-created problem; if the State of California didn’t allow billions of gallons of fresh water to spill into the Pacific Ocean every year, we wouldn’t have a water shortage.
The water war is no longer between North and South; it is between radical environmentalists and the people. Most think that the Colorado River is the largest river, but the Sacramento River is about 60 percent larger. The problem is that, while officials store 70 million acre feet of water from the Colorado River, only 10 million acre feet of water is stored from the Sacramento River. The rest is lost into the Pacific Ocean.
And now we are tearing down perfectly good hydroelectric dams at the behest of radical environmentalists. Environmentalists call these “fish-killing dams:” Iron Gate, Copco 1 and Copco 2 in California, and J.C. Boyle in Oregon.
The U.S. Department of Interior has been actively planning to destroy these four dams on the Klamath River in Northern California, ostensibly so that salmon can swim another 185 miles up the river. The Klamath River flows from southern Oregon through the Cascade and Coast mountain ranges to the California Pacific Coast.
These dams not only provide water and flood protection to thousands of family farmers and ranchers who live along the river, but clean energy from the hydroelectric dams supplies electricity to 70,000 residents in the area.
Despite a lack of scientific evidence that dam removal will help the fish, or any legitimate study on the human impact of dam removal, the Department of Interior is moving forward to have the dams destroyed, and the Klamath basin “restored.” They even call their website “Water For Fish.”
The phony science being used to support the Klamath restoration project rests entirely on the Coho Salmon population, which environmentalists claim is endangered. However, many say that the Coho Salmon isn’t even indigenous to the area.
Every year, 17,000 Coho Salmon return to the Klamath River. But these salmon can’t be counted, according to the DOI, because they are hatchery fish. “It’s like saying a baby born at home is more of a baby than one born in a hospital,” Congressman Tom McClintock told me in 2013, noting the idiocy of the DOI argument. “Clean, cheap, reliable hydropower is the backbone of many rural communities that not only rely on the affordable electricity, but water deliveries for irrigation and drinking.”
“Dam removal is not a series of isolated incidents, but a logical progression of dealing with aging infrastructure,” according to InternationalRivers.org, in a story titled, US Dam-Removal Season Off To A Good Start. “According to American Rivers, 65 US dams were removed in 2012, joining the nearly 1,100 dams that have been removed across the US since 1912. Nearly 800 of those dams were removed in the past 20 years.”
Weather is not man-made
According to Weather.com, more than 10 inches of rain hammered California last week.
Some impressive rainfall totals have already accumulated as of 7 p.m. PST Sunday:
– 11.44 inches near Honeydew, California
– 8.03 inches at the Penitencia Water Treatment in Santa Clara County, California
– 7.28 inches in Carrville, California
– 7 inches near Sims, California
– 6.01 inches in Ettersburg, California
– 5.08 inches in Rocky Butte, California
California’s population has increased dramatically while water storage has not. The population in California has doubled since 1977. And lousy planning in the hands of environmentalists and government has left the state in dire need during this drought.
Demolishing dams would eliminate clean hydroelectric power on the Klamath River and replace it with costly natural gas-fired power plants that pollute the air and allegedly contribute to man-made global warming. You have to ask yourself what the real motive is.
Posted by Katy Grimes on February 16, 2015.
Tags: budget deficit, California, California budget, California Legislature, cap-and-trade, CARB, Debt, Deficit, Democrats, drought, economy, Government, Jerry Brown, Katy Grimes, Legislature, regulations, Republicans, Sacramento, tax increases, Waste
Proudly powered by WordPress and Carrington. Log in | Register
WordPress Mobile Edition available from Crowd Favorite.
Happy New Year to all our viewers and followers. Expect to hear more from us this year. Love and best wishes to you and yours.
Rainwater harvesting can help in water security, conservation
BY: LEONARD T. PINEDA I
Thursday 22nd of May 2014
5 1 0 0 0
ILOILO CITY, May 21 (PIA) — A former chief of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) encouraged the public to practice rainwater harvesting to aid in water conservation and improve water security in the country.
“Seventy percent of our water needs in the household level can be met by rainwater,” said Elisea Gozun, former environment secretary and presently USAID (United States Agency for International Development) Contractor working as Climate Resiliency Team Leader under the Be Sure Project.
She said that technology of catching rain is not new but has been practiced in the past.
“We do not have acid rain in the Philippines and so that is fresh water. We used to take a bath under the rain, water the plants, wash our clothes, or clean our vehicles using rainwater,” she said.
She said that water security is a very big problem for the whole country precisely because the various consequences of climate change will have major impacts on water.
“There are four major consequences in climate change including variability of rainfall, the rising sea level, higher temperatures, and extreme weather,” she also said.
She said that it is very important to now plan differently because the situation now is different. “The world has changed and we know live in a more invasive environment,” she emphasized.
She said that water and energy conservation will go a long way in terms of climate change mitigation.
“The water that we use – to get it, to treat it, and to distribute requires the use of energy and energy production accounts for 55 percent of greenhouse gases in the Philippines. By maximizing the use of water reduces the production of greenhouse gases,” she explained.
“In terms of adaptation, if we want to maximize the capture of freshwater, it is necessary to build reservoirs and actually catching rainwater. Thus, making use of this free resources,” she added.
Gozun was a resource speaker during the conference on accelerating water security and climate resiliency among small water service providers organized by the USAID Water Security for Resilient Economic Growth and Stability (Be Secure) Project held May 20-22, 2014 at Hotel Del Rio here.
The Be Secure Project seeks to promote good governance and build capacity for long-term water security, improve access to water and wastewater treatment services, and build more resilient communities. (JCM/LTP/PIA-Iloilo)
China to boost water conservation
(Xinhua) 09:35, May 22, 2014
Email|Print twitter facebook Sina Microblog reddit
BEIJING, May 21 — China will accelerate the construction of water conservation projectsaccording to an executive meeting of the State Council chaired by Premier Li Keqiang onWednesday
The meeting urged faster construction of water transfer, reservoir and irrigation schemesespecially in central and western regions suffering water shortages. The move is toimprove water use and attract investment, to guarantee water security, help agricultureand alleviate poverty
The meeting decided that 172 water conservation projects will be launched before 2020,increasing water supply by 80 billion cubic meters every year
The projects will also save 26 billion cubic meters of water in agricultural production and expand irrigation areas of over 78 million mu (5.2 million hectares
1. Burn it.
2. Let it alone and it will evaporate
3. Skim it before it reaches land.
4. After skimming it, separate it from the water. One method is using Oil Lok.
If it reaches land, pick it up using Oil Lok.
Oil Lok will absorb the oil out of the sand and off the animals and store it inside its own matrix.
The cost of the material is far less than anything used at this time and far more effective that any absorbent used up to this point.
We guarantee our product. Who can say that about theirs now?
Agriculture uses most of our fresh water sources in the world. In domestic water usage, most of that water is recaptured, recycled and reused. So how to we make our agricultural use of water more efficient? This is the question.
One way is dealing with what we call the “reservoir capacity” of the soil. That is the moisture holding capacity associated with that soil in that location.
Many factors make up the holding capacity of soil. Sand has very little holding capacity, however in sand, toxins of the soil do not aggregate very rapidly. In clay soil, there is tremendous moisture holding capacity. However in some clay soils, the soil expands and eventually eliminates the percolation rate of the soil and waterlogs the soil. What do we do to adjust the soil to create the maximum effective growing area with the minimum amount of water? I have one of the answers. See you tomorrow.